I used to consult to wikipedia when I was a graduate student in China, majoring in American Literature. There is a Chinese wikipedia called 百度百科,comparatively focusing on the field of Chinese or Asian scope. I once compared these two pedias, and got my pratical conclusion. Once the information I was looking for concerning Chinese and Asian scope, I may consult to 百度百科; on the contrary, I would rather to wikipedia, which shares much broader and deeper view in the global perspective.
I was quite impressed by the “Siegenthaler controversy,” Dr. Tryon mentioned in his lecture, from which, defines the post-modernism. There’s no marginal, rather, by deconstruction, the binary opposition has been reconstructed into multi-direction. Everyone can share the knowledge, and even produce it. David Parry, in his article, “Wikipedia and the New Curriculum“, mentions that widipedia can “correct its own errors and relish the fact that others could not do the same” .Shannon Mattern suggests a good method to pigeonhole information by bookmarking, Delicious: Renovating the Mnemonic Architectures of Bookmarking.
In essence, wiki is based on the idea of collaboration and incorporation, aiming at sharing and producing the knowledge. Pendagogically, wiki can be applied to the team project. Students can be required to construct cultural-related topic, or litary-related assignment. For EFL students, they can be under the assgnment of translation, modifying and remodifying the translation. By doing so, they can realize how the application of translation theories into the pratical works. Study needs the process of interactions among students and of building the confidence by collaboration and incorporaion. As the teacher, he/she has to be very careful about the process of the project and measurement of the dedication from every student.
This is my wiki project: